IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58055 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2026 Thana- BENIPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Randhir Kumar Singh Son of Basant Singh Resident of Village- Shahpur, Ps- Benipatti, Dist- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate Mr. Rohit Kant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Sangeeta Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Benipatti P.S. Case No. 138 of 2026 dated 04.04.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)(a) and 26 of Arms Act. 3. As per the allegation, the informant received an information that a person has been injured and he was being treated at Darbhanga. Upon such information, when the informant along with police party reached at the house of Chandra Kishore Singh, he got an information that this petitioner has fired at Aditya Kumar injuring him who was being treated at DMCH. Upon reaching the house of this petitioner and searching the same, one empty shell and two sword were recovered and accordingly, search and seizure list was prepared. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58055 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026 2/2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and the seizure has been made in absence of this petitioner and no family members have been made seizure list witness. It has further been submitted that procedures prescribed under Section 103 B.N.S.S. has not been followed with. It has further been submitted that the petitioner has been made accused in altogether seven cases. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 02.06.2026. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Heard the parties and perused the records. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Madhubani, in connection with Benipatti P.S. Case No. 138 of 2026. 8. The application stands allowed. Abdus/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T