IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12601 of 2026 ====================================================== Rajnath Mallah Son of Pyar Chand Mallah, resident of Village- Budarzimi, P.S.- Mirganj, District-Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Bihar at Patna. 2. The Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Bihar at Patna. 3. The Secretary, at Sugarcane Department, Bihar at Patna. 4. The Collector, Gopalganj, Bihar. 5. The District Land Acquisition D.L.A. Officer, Gopalganj. 6. The Circle Officer, Mathua, District- Gopalganj. 7. The Officer Incharge, Hathua, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Madan Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Bipin Kumar Singh, SC- 22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 18-08-2026 Heard Mr.Madan Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bipin Kumar Singh, learned State counsel. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: (i) for issuance of appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions in the nature of mandamus to issue a direction to the respondents to conduct a proper measurement of the land bearing Khata No.160, Plot No.228, 304 and 308 situated under Mauza Surangi under the Anchal of Hathua, District- Gopalganj; Patna High Court CWJC No.12601 of 2026(2) dt.18-08-2026 2/2 (ii) for direction to the respondent after measurement exclude to the land of the petitioner for any construction of Hathua Sugar Factory; (iii) for any other relief for which petitioner found entitle. 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits he shall be submitting a petition before the Collector, Gopalganj (respondent no.04) for the redressal of the grievance. 4. Learned State counsel submits that if such petition is preferred, it will be taken to its logical conclusion in accordance with law. 5. In that background, the writ petition is disposed of allowing the petitioner to approach the concerned respondent in next four weeks who shall be noticing/hearing the parties and will take the matter to its logical conclusion Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U