Bindeshwari Rai @ Bindeshwari Ray @ Bindeshwar Rai v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./58046/2026 · 2026-08-19
Praveen Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29454 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29454 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58046 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-230 Year-2026 Thana- PARSA District- Saran ====================================================== Bindeshwari Rai @ Bindeshwari Ray @ Bindeshwar Rai R/o Late Bacchu Rai @ Late Bachchu Rai R/o Vill- Baligawn, P.S.- Parasa, Distt- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 230 of 2026 dated 24.04.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, allegedly, on a tip-off, the petitioner was arrested and altogether 4 litres of illicit country-made liquor was recovered from his possession.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that the reason for false implication of the petitioner is due to the fact as he was earlier made accused
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58046 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026 2/3 in similar nature of cases. It has further been submitted that although the petitioner has been made accused earlier in eight other cases of similar nature, but he is on bail in those cases. It is further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 24.04.2026, charge-sheet has been submitted in this case and there is no allegation of tampering against the petitioner.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Heard the parties and perused the records.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-named is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 3rd Exclusive Special Excise Court, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 230 of 2026, with the following conditions :- (i) One of the bailors should be close relative of the petitioner. (ii) The petitioner will be present on each and every date fixed in the trial and on failure on two consecutive dates without any plausible reason, the Court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58046 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026 3/3
8. The application stands allowed.
Abdus/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T