- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19772 RSA No. 1754 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1754 OF 2024 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SHANKARAPPA S/O. BASAVANYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O. VRUTHIKOPPA VILLAGE, ANAVATTI HOBLI, SORABA TALUK - 577 429, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. 2. BASAVARAJAPPA S/O. BASAVANYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. VRUTHIKOPPA VILLAGE, ANAVATTI HOBLI, SORABA TALUK - 577 429, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. 3. MANJAPPA S/O. PUTTAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. VRUTHIKOPPA VILLAGE, ANAVATTI HOBLI, SORABA TALUK - 577 429, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. P.N. HARISH, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19772 RSA No. 1754 of 2024 AND: 1. KOTRAPPA S/O. SANAKOTRAPPA, MAJOR IN AGE, R/O. VRUTHIKOPPA VILLAGE, ANAVATTI HOBLI, SORABA TALUK - 577 429, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. 2. SHEELAMMA W/O. PARAMESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O. VRUTHIKOPPA VILLAGE, ANAVATTI HOBLI, SORABA TALUK - 577 429, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (R1 AND R2 SERVED) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.08.2024 PASSED IN RA NO.22/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SHIVAMOGGA, SITTING AT SAGAR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.11.2011 PASSED IN OS NO.322/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SORABA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19772 RSA No. 1754 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo dated 06.04.2026. 2. Memo reads as under: :The appellants respectfully submit that they do not intend to prosecute the above appeal further and as such request this Hon’ble court to dismiss the above appeal without costs by considering this memo in the ends of justice.” 3. The memo is signed by the appellants No.1 to 3 along with the counsel appearing for the appellants. 4. In view of the memo and submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellants, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/ (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE BVK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20