Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2945 (BOM)

MAURYA EDUCATIONAL TRUST DELHIS TAKSHILA SCHOOL THR ITS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER SHUBHAM M DHOIPHODE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/8430/2026 · 2026-07-27

Shri Abasaheb D Shinde, Shri N B Suryawanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

*1* 63 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 63 WRIT PETITION NO. 8430 OF 2026 Maurya Educational Trust Delhis Takshila School Thr Its Administrative Officer Shubham M Dhoiphode VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Others ... Mr. Prashant R. Nangare, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for Respondents/State Mr. Santosh B. Pulkundwar, Advocate for Respondent No.4 … WRIT PETITION NO. 8616 OF 2026 New English School VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Others ... Ms. Devika Patil h/f. Mr. Yogesh M. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for Respondents/State Ms. Archana J. Pawar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 and 5. … WRIT PETITION NO. 8634 OF 2026 Shri. Sai English Medium School and Ors. VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through & Ors. ... Ms. Devika Patil h/f. Mr. Yogesh M. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for Respondents/State Mr. V. V. Gujar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 and 5 ... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI & ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 27th JULY 2026 Narwade 2026:BHC-AUG:31680-DB *2* 63 P. C. :- 1. In all these petitions by the individual institutions common grievance has been made that inspite of having admitted students under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, they have not been reimbursed the fees as per the statute. 2. The Principal Seat, as also all the benches have been in similar fact and situation directing the authorities to consider the individual proposals and to take appropriate decision within a stipulated time. We follow the course. 3. Writ petitions are disposed of with following directions : The respondent/authorities shall undertake scrutiny of each of the petitioners’ proposals independently on their own merits and decide the same as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of four (04) weeks from today and shall disburse the money to them if they are found entitled to within a period of four (04) weeks thereafter. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Narwade