Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29431 (PNJ)

GURPINDER SINGH ALIAS GOPI v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/21007/2026 · 2026-07-15

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 229 CRM-M-21007-2026 Date of decision: 15th July, 2026 Gurpinder Singh @ Gopi ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Anmol Jeevan Singh Gill, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shruti, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate for the complainant. *** MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):- Status report has been filed by respondent-State. The same is taken on record. Learned State counsel, upon instructions, submits that the trial stands concluded insofar as the prosecution evidence is concerned, as all the witnesses stand examined. 2. Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant and has filed his memo of appearance. In view of the above, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with a direction to the learned trial Court to decide the case expeditiously. 3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a direction to the learned trial Court to decide the case expeditiously, PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.07.15 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-21007-2026 -2- preferably within a period of three months from today, subject to the petitioner examining his defence witnesses, if any, within a short time. 4. Since the main petition has already been disposed of, pending application, if any, is rendered infructuous. [MANISHA BATRA] JUDGE 15th July, 2026 Parveen Sharma 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No 2. Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.07.15 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document