Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29430 (CAL)

NRIPENDRA CH SILSARMA v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

WP.ST/4/2026 · 2026-07-22

Shampa Sarkar, Smita Das De

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Item 22 22.07.2026 Court. No. 11 Cp Calcutta High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri WPST/4/2026 NRIPENDRA CH. SILSARMA VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Mr. Jakir Hossain Choudhury Mr. Sudip Sarkar Ms. Taniya Bhowmik …for the petitioner. Mr. Kunaljit Bhattacharjee Ms. Esha Acharya …..for the State. 1. We appreciate the agony of the petitioner that although the matter was pending before the tribunal since long, due to non-functioning of the tribunal the matter could not be taken up. The petitioner is 80 years old. 2. Learned AGP raised the question of maintainability and submits that the petitioner ought to have moved the writ court. 3. We agree with the submission of the learned AGP. Accordingly, the petitioner is at liberty to move the writ court on the self-same issue which is pending before the tribunal. 2 4. It is made clear that if the writ petition is disposed of, the original application filed in the tribunal will become infructuous. 5. Accordingly, WPST 4 of 2026 is disposed of. 6. Parties are directed to act on the basis of the server copy of this order. (Shampa Sarkar, J.) (Smita Das De, J.)