Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP-3197-2026 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-3197-2026 Date of decision: 15.07.2026 Raj Kumar ...Pe##oner Versus Raja Shekhar Vandru, Addi#onal Chief Secretary, Department of Transport, Haryana and others ...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. Piyush Aggarwal, Advocate for the pe##oner. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) By way of this pe##on filed under Sec#ons 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Ar#cle 215 of the Cons#tu#on of India, pe##oner prays for ini#a#ng contempt proceedings for viola#ng the
order dated 06.04.2026 (Annexure P-1) passed by this Court in CWP No.9990 of 2026 #tled Raj Kumar vs. State of Haryana and others.
2. The opera#ve por#on of the order dated 06.04.2026 is as under:-
“In view of the above, without adver ng to the merits of the case, respondent No.3-General Manager, Haryana Raodways. Yamuna Nagar Depot. Yamuna Nagar, is directed to decide the legal no ce dated 10.03.2026 (Annexure P-7), in view of judgment passed by this Court in CWP-25743-2024 decided on 04.10.2024, a5er providing due opportunity of personal hearing to the pe oner, within a period of 08 weeks from the date of receipt of cer fied copy of this order. The order so passed shall be furnished to the pe oner within one week therea5er.”
3. No#ce of mo#on.
4. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G. Haryana, accepts no#ce on behalf of the respondent-State and has placed on record a copy of the
order dated 08.07.2026 passed by the General Manager, Haryana YOGESH MEHTA 2026.07.15 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
COCP-3197-2026 [2] Roadways, Yamuna Nagar, whereby, aCer considering the legal no#ce dated 10.03.2026 of the pe##oner, his claim has been rejected.
5. Counsel for the pe##oner concedes that the pe##oner was duly given an opportunity of hearing before passing of the said order.
6. In view of the above, nothing else is required to be done. Counsel for the pe##oner submits that other similarly situated persons have been given the benefits, but not the pe##oner. In case it is so and the pe##oner is not sa#sfied with the order dated 08.07.2026 as placed on record today, he shall be at liberty to avail of such remedy as may be available to him in accordance with law.
7.
Disposed of. 15.07.2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) Yogesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No YOGESH MEHTA 2026.07.15 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document