1 CGHC010276662026 2026:CGHC:32490-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1969 of 2026 1 - Gyanendra Kumar Upadhyay S/o Ramniwas Upadhyay Aged About 54 Years R/o V I P City, Sector 06, Plot No.06 Saddu, Police Station Vidhansabha District- Raipur Chhattisgarh, 2 - Gaurav Abhishek Upadhyay S/o Gyanendra Kumar Upadhyay Aged About 27 Years R/o V I P City, Sector 06, Plot No.06 Saddu, Police Station Vidhansabha District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Satrupa Upadhyay D/o Gyanendra Kumar Upadhyay Aged About 24 Years R/o V I P City, Sector 06, Plot No.06, Saddu, Police Station Vidhansabha District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, Police Station Vidhansabha, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Nityanand Sharma S/o Shivkumar Sharma Aged About 55 Years R/o V I P City, Sector 06, Plot No.05, Saddu, Police Station Vidhansabha District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners : Ms. Mamta Mahilange, Advocate For Respondent No.1/State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Govt. Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 29.07.2026 1. Heard Ms. Mamta Mahilange, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondent No.1. ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita with the following prayers :- “(i) Quash FIR dated 01.12.2025 in crime no. 594/2025 registered at Police Station Vidhansabha, district Raipur Chhattisgarh Under Sections 296, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayaya Sanhita, 2023. (ii) Pass any other order in view of the above facts and circumstances mentioned in the present petition, in the interest of justice.” 3. From perusal of the prayers and pleadings made in the instant petition, it transpires that though has petitioner has annexed the copy of charge-sheet and order taking cognizance as well as Annexure-P/6, but he has not challenged the charge-sheet and order taking cognizance and further from perusal of the order- sheet of the trial Court annexed with the petition, it transpires that charges have already been framed against the petitioners, but the petitioner has not challenged the same, which goes to show that the prayer drafted by learned counsel for the petitioners is in a very casual manner and further wasted the precious time of the Court. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed on this ground alone with liberty to file afresh petition with appropriate prayer, if so wishes, subject to depositing a sum of Rs.5,000/- as cost by the petitioner before the Registry of this Court and submit a receipt of 3 the same at the time of filing of the fresh petition, if any, and the amount so deposited, if any, shall be transmitted to the Children Observation Home, Pulgaon, Durg (C.G.). Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra