165 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-5296-2026 Date of Decision: July 15, 2026 Roshan Lal …Pe++oner Versus Prem Lata and another …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Kul Bhushan Sharma, Advocate for the peoner. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) In a suit for specific performance filed by the peoner, a er closure of the evidence of both the pares, plainff-peoner had moved an applicaon (Annexure P-2) for ge(ng compared the signatures of defendant No.2 from the handwring expert. Said applicaon has been dismissed by the trial Court vide impugned order dated 09.07.2026 (Annexure P-1), which is assailed before this Court. 2. On query, learned counsel for the peoner concedes that no applicaon was moved for permi(ng the peoner to produce addional evidence. Upon this, learned counsel for the peoner has made statement so as to withdraw this peon with liberty to file fresh applicaon before the concerned trial Court for producon of addional evidence. 3. In view of the aforesaid statement, present revision peon is hereby disposed of, having withdrawn with liberty to the peoner to move appropriate applicaon for producing addional evidence before the concerned trial Court. In case, any such applicaon is filed before the Court concerned, the same shall be considered and decided as per law. July 15, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SARITA RANI 2026.07.15 17:29 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order