CRM-M-31251-2026 -1- 209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31251-2026 Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 Mohd. Tarik Sah …Petitioner vs. State of Haryana …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Parmod Kumar, AAG, Haryana. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to him in case FIR No. 176, dated 27.03.2026 registered under Sections 3(5), & 108 of BNS, 2023 (Earlier Sections 34 and 306 of IPC), at Police Station Palla, District Faridabad. 2. While granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail by this Court on 27.05.2026, the following contentions were noticed by this Court and the same have been reproduced below:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that even from the reading of the allegations levelled by the complainant in the FIR, no offence under Section 108 of BNS is made out against the petitioner. In fact, there were temperamental differences between the petitioner and his co-accused and the deceased, who was brother of the petitioner only and due to this, the petitioner has been named by him as one of the accused in the present case. He further submits that in fact, the deceased was suffering from HEMLATA 2026.07.15 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-31251-2026 -2- depression and his mental health was not stable. Due to this, the deceased had taken the extreme steps by hanging himself. Learned counsel further refers to the affidavits (Annexure P-2 and P-3) to submit that the matter has been amicably resolved between the parties.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated the submissions and further submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation may not be required. 4. In compliance of order dated 27.05.2026 passed by this Court, short reply by way of an affidavit of Deputy Superintendent of Police, City-II, District Patiala has been filed by learned State counsel in Court today and the same is taken on record. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Yogender, submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 27.05.2026, passed by this Court is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 14.07.2026 JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HEMLATA 2026.07.15 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document