Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29399 (PNJ)

M/S SHREE SIDDHI VINAYAK INDUSTRIES v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CWP/18310/2026 · 2026-07-09

Rohit Kapoor, To Be Nominated

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

188 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA M/s Shree Siddhi Vinayak Industries State of Punjab and another CORAM: HON’BLE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. AG, Punjab. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. 1. A issue involved in this writ petition stands finally adjudicated by this Court in Tecnimont S CWP No.18967 2. In such vi disposed of in terms of 3. All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand 09.07.2026 rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-183 Date of Decision: 09.07.2026 M/s Shree Siddhi Vinayak Industries Vs. State of Punjab and another HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. J.S. Bedi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. AG, Punjab. *** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral) At the outset, learned counsel for the issue involved in this writ petition stands finally adjudicated by this Court in nimont Spa India Project Office vs. State of Punjab and another CWP No.18967-2020, decided on 10.12.2024. In such view of the matter, the present petition also stands disposed of in terms of Tecnimont Spa India Project Office All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA ACTING 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 18310-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.07.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. AG, Punjab. (Oral) learned counsel for the parties points out that the issue involved in this writ petition stands finally adjudicated by this Court in India Project Office vs. State of Punjab and another decided on 10.12.2024. ew of the matter, the present petition also stands India Project Office (supra). All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No parties points out that the issue involved in this writ petition stands finally adjudicated by this Court in India Project Office vs. State of Punjab and another ew of the matter, the present petition also stands RAJESH KUMAR 2026.07.14 12:08 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.