Sunil Singh @ Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./29918/2026 · 2026-08-18
Rajiv Roy
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29397 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29397 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29918 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-444 Year-2025 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran ======================================================
1. Sunil Singh @ Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Kumar Singh S/O Ram Babu Singh Resident of Village- Dharampur, Ward no.- 1, P.S- Kalyan Pur, District - East Champaran (Bihar)
2. Ankit Kumar @ Ankit Kumar Singh S/O Sunil Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Dharampur, Ward no.- 1, P.S- Kalyan Pur, District - East Champaran (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate Mr. Mohan Kr. Tiwari, Advocate Mr. Vishesh Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Basant Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 4 18-08-2026 Heard Mr. Basant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned APP. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 444 of 2025 for the offence under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 76, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS lodged on 12.12.2025 by the informant, Most. Lalpari Devi. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that, on 08.12.2025, as she was sitting at her door, the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29918 of 2026(4) dt.18-08-2026 2/5 accused persons armed variously came and after outraging the modesty, allegation is that Ankit Singh gave blow on the head causing injuries to her daughter-in-law, Rishi Singh gave iron rod blow to her maternal granddaughter, Kaushalya Devi who became unconscious and Sunil gave iron rod blow to her son, Jitendra as also Pintu Singh gave the order of not to spare anyone. This led to the FIR. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that there is a case and counter-case, the FIR has been lodged after the delay of four days, the occurrence being on 08.12.2025 while the FIR is of 12.12.2025, they have no criminal antecedent and the injuries have been found to be simple in nature. Further, the submission is that without accepting the allegation and/or the outcome of the present petition in view of the fact that the informant’s side has alleged injuries, the petitioners on their own would like to contribute Rs. 5,000/- each (totalling Rs.
10,000/-) towards the medical assistance of the injured (Jitendra Sah and Kaushalya Devi) through Demand Draft issued by the local State Bank of India/any Nationalized Bank branch to be submitted before the ‘NAZARAT’ of concerned Court to be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29918 of 2026(4) dt.18-08-2026 3/5 handed over to the injured after checking the credentials. 5. Earlier, the Coordinate Bench had called for the case diary and the injury report and it shows that the injuries have been found to be simple in nature. 6. Learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that though the injuries have been found to be simple in nature, the allegation of assault is against both of them. 7. Taking into account the submissions of the parties as also that there is case and counter-case and they have no criminal antecedent, in that background, this Court is inclined to extend them the privilege of anticipatory bail with conditions subject to payment of Rs. 5,000/- each (totalling Rs. 10,000/-) as undertaken by the learned counsel for the petitioners to be paid by Demand Draft of local State Bank of India branch/any Nationalized bank branch to be submitted to the Trial Court and handed over to the injured. 8. If, however, it is found that contrary to the statement made in paragraph-3, the petitioners have criminal antecedent, the present order shall become infructuous. 9. Let the petitioners be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29918 of 2026(4) dt.18-08-2026 4/5 from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate-12,
East
Champaran
at Motihari/concerned Court in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 444 of 2025 subject to the following conditions: (i) one of the bailor should be the family member/relative of the petitioners who shall provide official document (Aadhaar Card/Voter ID Card/Pan Card/Driving License) to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioners shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of their bail bond by the Trial Court itself; (iii) the petitioners shall appear before the concerned police station every month for six months to mark their attendance and after the end of the period, the certificate shall be submitted before the Trial Court failing which steps shall be taken for the cancellation of the bail bonds; (iv) the petitioners shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29918 of 2026(4) dt.18-08-2026 5/5 failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds; (v) the petitioners shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T