Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29396 (PAT)

Vikash Kumar @ Golu v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./25704/2026 · 2026-08-19

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25704 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-330 Year-2025 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Vikash Kumar @ Golu S/O Ram Shankar Singh R/O Vill.- Mahthi, P.S- Bibhutipur, Distt.- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhav Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 19-08-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 330 of 2025 registered for the offence under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. Unknown criminals had killed the deceased. Subsequently, during the course of investigation, it has come that the petitioner had called the deceased, and thereafter, the deceased was killed by the petitioner, Ayush, Saurav Kumar and others. On the statement of the co-accused, the murder weapon was recovered. The co-accused have also given self-inculpatory statements naming the petitioner as one of the accused. 4. The petitioner is in custody since 08.12.2025. The Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25704 of 2026(4) dt.19-08-2026 2/2 allegations against the petitioner are serious and grave in nature. There exists prima facie material against the petitioner indicating his involvement in the commission of the offence. 5. Considering the nature of the accusation, the gravity of the offence and the materials available on record, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands dismissed. 7. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner. Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T