Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010284462025
2026:CGHC:32585
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7789 of 2025 Bhuvaneshwar Yadav S/o Shri Angad Ram Yadav Aged About 41 Years R/o Goutia Para, Village And Post Ludeg, Tehsil Pathalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G.)
Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Registrar Co-Operative Societies, Block 3, Second And Third Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Assistant Registrar Co-Operative Societies, Jashpur, District Jashpur (C.G.) 3 - Collector Jashpur, District Jashpur (C.G.) 4 - Authorized Officer Aadim Jati Seva Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Ludeg, Registration Number 96, Ludeg, Tehsil Pathalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G.) 5 - Manager Aadim Jati Seva Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Ludeg, Registration Number 96, Ludeg, Tehsil Pathalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G.) 6 - Chairman Aadim Jati Seva Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Ludeg, Registration Number 96, Ludeg, Tehsil Pathalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G.)
Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sourav Agrawal, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For State : Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiya, GA RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2026.07.29 18:02:15 +0530
2
(HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 29/07/2026
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the State submits that though notices were issued to respondent Nos. 4 to 6 on the previous date of hearing, the petitioner is challenging the resolution of the Society whereby he has been removed from the post of Assistant Manager. He submits that the present writ petition is not maintainable as the petitioner has an alternative remedy under the Cooperative Societies Act, where he can pursue his grievance in a service dispute between him and the society.
2. In view of the above submission, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU)
JUDGE Rahul