Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29390 (CHH)

KHEDURAM VERMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1345/2023 · 2026-07-27

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010086152023 2026:CGHC:32160 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1345 of 2023 1 - Kheduram Verma S/o Shri Fool Singh Verma Aged About 70 Years R/o Village Kharora, Tahsil Tilda, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Tahsildar Tahsil Kharora, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Nagar Panchayat Kharora, Raipur Through Chief Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat Kharora, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. P. Sahu, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. G.A. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 28/07/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “(i) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ order or direction to the respondents authorities to stop the construction work on the land bearing khasra no. 997/5 and 997/6 area 0.67 areas situated at Kharora Revenue circle kharora, Tahsil Tilda, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, in the interest of justice. (ii) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ order or direction to the respondents petitioner's applicant within stipulated period as may given by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice. (iii) Any other relief, which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat