IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 128 CWP No.17212 of 2026 Date of decision: July 15th, 2026 Sumitra Yadav and others .....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Vinay Gaur, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has submitted that although in the petition, it has been stated that there is no other alternative remedy of appeal or revision available to the petitioners but the impugned order is appealable under Section 19 of the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975. 2. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file the aforesaid appeal. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE July 15th, 2026 (SUBHAS MEHLA) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.07.15 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh