Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29376 (PAT)

Jay Prakash Kumar @ Jay Prakash Bhagat v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./23218/2026 · 2026-08-07

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23218 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-616 Year-2024 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Jay Prakash Kumar @ Jay Prakash Bhagat S/o- Parmanand Bhagat R/o vill- Khartari P.S- Chiraiya Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhannjay Kumar No 2 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Arun Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 07-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offence under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per F.I.R., two unknown persons, riding on a motorcycle, came at C.S.P. Centre of son of informant and fired at him, on account of which, son of informant died. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that name of the petitioner surfaced in this case during investigation on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. Save & except this, there is no other material against this petitioner to show his complicity in the alleged offence. He further submits that co-accused, Parmendra Kumar, having similar & identical allegation, has already been granted bail, vide order dated 08.05.2026 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 26303 of 2026, by a Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23218 of 2026(3) dt.07-08-2026 2/2 coordinate Bench of this Court. Petitioner is in custody since 16.09.2025. Chargesheet has been submitted. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the nature of accusation and period of custody, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Motihari (East Champaran) / concerned Court in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 616 of 2024 on further conditions: “(i) One of the bailors shall be close relative of the petitioner. (ii) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall remain physically present on each and every date, as fixed by the Court, and on his absence on two consecutive dates, without prior permission/sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.” anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T