Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2937 (RAJ)

HASIM S/O SAHIDA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6344/2026 · 2026-04-28

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:17956] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6344/2026 Hasim S/o Sahida, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Nagla Aram Singh (Sadibas), Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg. (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In Deeg Jail) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhagat Singh Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 28/04/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.129/2025 registered at Police Station Sikari, District Deeg for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 303(2), 111(2)(a), 313, 61(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of IT Act, 2008. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR. The co-accused namely Fida Hussain, Wajid, Irfan, and Ajruddin who are named in the FIR have already been granted the benefit of bail by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.07.2025. [2026:RJ-JP:17956] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6344/2026] Petitioner is behind the bars since 29.03.2026. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Hasim S/o Sahida, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/55