Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29366 (ORI)

SATYABRATA SAHOO v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/17128/2026 · 2026-07-29

S K Panigrahi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.17128 of 2026 Satyabrata Sahoo & Ors. ... Petitioner(s) Mr. S. K. Mahanty, Advoate -Versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Party (s) Ms. Gayatri Patra, ASC CORAM: DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI ORDER Order No. 29.07.2026 02. I.A. No.14182 of 2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. Heard. 3. This application has been filed for impleadment of the Commissioner, Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation, Bhubaneswar as Opposite Party No.4 to the Writ Petition. 4. Considering the submissions and averments made in this I.A., this Court is of the opinion that the aforesaid party is necessary party for proper and effective adjudication of the case. Hence, the prayer made in this I.A is allowed. 5. Consolidated cause title already filled be accepted. 6. The I.A is accordingly disposed of. Digitally Signed Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 30-Jul-2026 17:24:28 Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) No.17128 of 2026 7. The Petitioners, by filing this Writ Petition, have sought for a direction from this Court to the Opposite Party No.2/Secretary, Bhubaneswar Development Authority to ensure proper rehabilitation and relocation of the petitioner before initiating eviction demolition drive by the enforcement wing of the BDA. 8. During course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that before approaching this Court, the Petitioners have already ventilated their grievance before the Secretary, Bhubaneswar Development Authority/Opposite Party No.2 by way of representation dated 23.03.2026 vide Annexures-5 series. He further submits that the said grievance of the Petitioners is still pending. 9. He, accordingly, prays that a direction may be issued to the Secretary, Bhubaneswar Development Authority/Opposite Party No.2 for considering the said grievance of the Petitioners. 10. Considering the submission of the Petitioners and on going through the averments made in this Writ Petition, this Court without going into the merits of the case, directs the Secretary, Bhubaneswar Development Authority/Opposite Party No.2 to act upon the representation filed by the present Petitioners. The same Digitally Signed exercise shall be completed within a period of one month from the Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 30-Jul-2026 17:24:28 Signature Not Verified date of presentation of a certified copy of this order. However, if the authority wishes to evict the Petitioners in future, they shall be given an opportunity of hearing. 11. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. ( Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Gitanjali