Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29363 (KAR)

SMT SUMATHI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/5750/2022 · 2026-07-17

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010279312022 NC: 2026:KHC:36981 CRL.P No. 5750 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5750 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SUMATHI W/O J. SUKUMAR AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 2. SRI. SUKUMAR J S/O LATE JAYAVELU AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS 3. SMT. RAMANI W/O M. GANESH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, PETITIONER NO.1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT NO.23, PADMA NIVAS ANJANEYA TEMPLE STREET YELLAGUDNA PALYA BENGALURU - 560 047. 4. SMT. SUJATHA W/O VINOD AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, 5. SRI. VINOD S/O LATE PREMKUMAR AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010279312022 NC: 2026:KHC:36981 CRL.P No. 5750 of 2022 PETITIONER NO. 4 AND 5 ARE RESIDING AT NO.09 L.L. ENCLAVE, BENAKANAGAR K. CHANNASANDRA POST HORAMAVU, BENGALUIRU - 560 043. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KUMBAR VASANT FAKEERAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY EAST ZONE WOMEN POLICE STATION REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. SMT. S.M. SUPRIYA W/O SUSHANTH.S D/O S.M. MANIMARAN AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.217 ROAD NO.05, DEFENCE LAYOUT VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU - 560 097. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SOWMYA R, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. VASANTH KUMAR N, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.86/2022 REGISTERED BY THE EAST ZONE WOMEN POLICE STATION/RESPONDENT NO.01 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498A, 326, 354(A)(4), 504, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC AND SEC.3 AND 4 OF D.P ACT, PENDING ON THE FILE OF - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010279312022 NC: 2026:KHC:36981 CRL.P No. 5750 of 2022 THE VI A.C.M.M., AT BENGALURU VIDE AT ANNEXURE-A, AS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioners has filed a Memo stating that during pendency of above petition, matter was settled between complainant and accused before Family Court and based on same, proceedings in C.C.no.32717/2022 have been quashed rendering above petition infructuous. 2. Taking Memo on record, Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6