Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010279312022 NC: 2026:KHC:36981 CRL.P No. 5750 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5750 OF 2022 BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. SUMATHI W/O J. SUKUMAR AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
2.
SRI. SUKUMAR J S/O LATE JAYAVELU AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
3.
SMT. RAMANI W/O M. GANESH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
PETITIONER NO.1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT NO.23, PADMA NIVAS ANJANEYA TEMPLE STREET YELLAGUDNA PALYA BENGALURU - 560 047.
4.
SMT. SUJATHA W/O VINOD AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
5.
SRI. VINOD S/O LATE PREMKUMAR AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010279312022 NC: 2026:KHC:36981 CRL.P No. 5750 of 2022
PETITIONER NO. 4 AND 5 ARE RESIDING AT NO.09 L.L. ENCLAVE, BENAKANAGAR K. CHANNASANDRA POST HORAMAVU, BENGALUIRU - 560 043. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KUMBAR VASANT FAKEERAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY EAST ZONE WOMEN POLICE STATION REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
SMT. S.M. SUPRIYA W/O SUSHANTH.S D/O S.M. MANIMARAN AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.217 ROAD NO.05, DEFENCE LAYOUT VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU - 560 097. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SOWMYA R, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. VASANTH KUMAR N, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.86/2022 REGISTERED BY THE EAST ZONE WOMEN POLICE STATION/RESPONDENT NO.01 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498A, 326, 354(A)(4), 504, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC AND SEC.3 AND 4 OF D.P ACT, PENDING ON THE FILE OF
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010279312022 NC: 2026:KHC:36981 CRL.P No. 5750 of 2022
THE VI A.C.M.M., AT BENGALURU VIDE AT ANNEXURE-A, AS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioners has filed a Memo stating that during pendency of above petition, matter was settled between complainant and accused before Family Court and based on same, proceedings in C.C.no.32717/2022 have been quashed rendering above petition infructuous.
2. Taking Memo on record, Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6