Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2936 (ALL)

SATISH CHANDRA GOYAL v. MR RAJ KARAN NAYYAR AND 2 OTHERS

CAPL/324/2026 · 2026-05-04

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 324 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Pursuant to the earlier order, the instructions have come, which are taken on record. 2. According to the said instructions, the FIR cannot be lodged as no criminal case has been made out. 3. In view of the said fact, the contempt application stands dismissed. The applicant has remedy of approaching the court concerned under Section 175(3) of the B.N.S.S.. May 5, 2026 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sharad Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Satish Chandra Goyal .....Applicant(s) Mr Raj Karan Nayyar And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad