IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58262 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-118 Year-2026 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Kaishar S/o Late Sirajuddin @ Md. Sirajuddin R/o Village- Charrapti Ward No 09, P.S- Bhargama, District- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anshuman Singh, Mr. Madhav Jha, Advocate Mr. Nishant Chaudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 18-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 338, 340(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 36, 38, 42 of the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act. 3. Informant alleges that on 22.4.2026, on a secret information, police raided the house of this petitioner where laptop, mobile phones, scanners, fake birth certificates and Aadhaar cards were seized. This petitioner along with others was, allegedly, involved in preparing and supplying forged Aadhaar cards. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to village policits. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58262 of 2026(2) dt.18-08-2026 2/2 No incriminating material has been recovered from possession of the petitioner. As a matter of fact, the alleged documents and items were recovered from an abandoned house with no gates. Petitioner has got no concern either with the alleged recovery or the house in question. Petitioner is a teacher in government school and there is no chance of tampering with evidence or absconding. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Araria in connection with Bhargama P. S. Case No. 118 of 2026, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T