VASU AGGARWAL & OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/31170/2026 · 2026-07-15
N S Shekhawat
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29356 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29356 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
128 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31170-2026 Date of Decision:15.07.2026 Vasu Aggarwal and Ors. …Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and Ors. …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present: Dr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Pratham Sethi, Advocate Mr. Souravdeep Bajwa, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. M.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab. Mr. P.S Ahluwalia, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Deepinder Singh Virk, Advocate for the complainant. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral)
1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to direct the official respondents not to harass the petitioners in connivance with respondent No.6.
2. On advance notice, Mr. M.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab has appeared on behalf of official respondents and submits that one FIR No.57 dated 13.07.2026, under Section 316(2), 85 of B.N.S, Police Station Women, District Patiala has been registered against petitioner No.1.
3. Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the present petition.
4. Dismissed as not pressed. HITESH 2026.07.15 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh
CRM-M-31170-2026 -2
5. Needless to observe that the petitioners would be at liberty to avail their alternative remedies, if any, in accordance with law.
(N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 15.07.2026
JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2026.07.15 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh