IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58051 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2026 Thana- KURSAILA District- Katihar ====================================================== Md. Jahangir Son of Md. Maqbul @ Md. Makhbul Resident of village- Mehar miya tola, PS- Kursela, Distt- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Kursela P.S. Case No. 205 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, one country made pistol along with one live cartridge was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that procedure prescribed under Section 103 and 105 of the B.N.S.S. have not been followed with. It has further been submitted that petitioner is in judicial custody since 25.05.2026 and he has got no criminal antecedent. Chargesheet has been filed in this case and there is no allegation of tampering against Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58051 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026 2/2 the petitioner. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in connection with Kursela P.S. Case No. 205 of 2026. 8. The application stands allowed. 9. It is directed that the petitioner will not get involved himself in any similar nature of offence in future, and if he gets involved in the same, the prosecution would be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of his bail bonds. 10. One of the bailors shall be close relative of the petitioner. Ankit Kumar/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T