Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29352 (PNJ)

JAGWINDER SINGH CHEEMA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/27529/2026 · 2026-07-14

N S Shekhawat

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-27529-2026 -1- 207 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-27529-2026 Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 Jagwinder Singh Cheema …Petitioner vs. State of Punjab and another …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Karan Raj Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. DAG, Punjab. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Section 438 of Cr.P.C.) with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to him in case FIR No.164 dated 28.12.2024, registered under Sections 406, 420 of IPC (Sections 316(2), 318(4) of BNS), at Police Station Urban Estate, Patiala, District Patiala. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 14.05.2026, passed by this Court, the petitioner had deposited a sum of Rs.1.50 lacs with the Court of Area Magistrate/trial Court and has joined the investigation. 3. Learned State counsel has submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 14.05.2026, passed HEMLATA 2026.07.15 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-27529-2026 -2- by this Court is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 14.07.2026 JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HEMLATA 2026.07.15 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document