DINESH KUMAR ALIAS DINESH KUMAR MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1879/2026 · 2026-04-08
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2935 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2935 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:10079] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. no. 1879 of 2026
Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh Kumar Mandal, aged about 26 years, Son of Anand Prasad, Resident of Village-Bhothai, Murgawa, P.O. + P.S.-Bishnugarh, , District- Hazaribagh, Jharkhand.
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. J.S. Tiwary , Adv. For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan , Addl.. PP
03 / 08.04.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Tatijharia P. S. case no. 07 of 2026 instituted under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 132, 221, 109(1), 324 (2), 352/ 3 (5) of BNS, 2023.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of the common intention with the co-accused persons, used criminal force against the public servant police personnel, deterring them from discharging their duty. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that though the FIR was registered inter alia under Section 109(1) of the BNS but it is evident from para 46 of the case diary, that the charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner for having committed the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 132, 221, 324 (2), 352/ 3 (5) of BNS, 2023. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 18.01.2026, as mentioned in para 14 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned
counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to indulge in any offence in any manner during trial of the case, if released on bail hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Hazaribag in connection with Tatijharia P. S. case no. 07 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will not indulge in any offence in any manner during trial of the case, if released on bail and will co- operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Dated 08.04.2026
Smita/-