Sushil Yadav @ Sushil Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./57835/2026 · 2026-08-20
Satyavrat Verma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29344 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29344 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57835 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2026 Thana- BOKHRA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Sushil Yadav @ Sushil Kumar Yadav S/O Janardhan Yadav @ Janardan Yadav Resident of Village- Mahisautha, P.S.- Bokhra, Dist- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 20-08-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State, Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of five cases out of which two cases are under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 3576.240 liters of liquor from a truck. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of the seized vehicle and he came to be implicated based on secret information which is the easiest way to implicate
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57835 of 2026(2) dt.20-08-2026 2/3 someone. It is also submitted that once an accused is implicated in a case relating to excise, the police starts implicating mechanically either at the instance of Chowkidar, local person, confessional statement or secret information without holding a proper investigation. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Trial Court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bokhra P.S. Case No. 163 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. 7.
It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than five cases then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57835 of 2026(2) dt.20-08-2026 3/3 antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of five cases only, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. Rishabh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T