HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15521 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Mukul Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Radhey Shyam, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record. 3. The present bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed on behalf of applicant with a prayer to release her on bail in Case Crime No. 119 of 2026 under Sections 109(1), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 221, 126(2), 121(1), 132, 115(2), 352, 351(3) BNS and 7 Criminal Law (Amendment) Act registered at Police Station Sahawar, District Kasganj during pendency of the trial. 4. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and she has been languishing in jail since 15.4.2026. It is further submitted that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant. It is further submitted that as per the FIR, 36 named and 10-15 unknown persons are said to have pelted stones and bricks on a procession being led by another group of persons. It is further submitted that two police persons are said to have received injuries in the alleged incident. It is also submitted that the applicant undertakes that she will not misuse the liberty, if granted. It has also been pointed out that in the wake of heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is no likelihood of any early conclusion of trial. 5. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant. 6. As per the FIR, 36 named and 10-15 unknown persons are said to have pelted stones and bricks on a procession being led by another group of persons. Two police persons are also said to have received injuries in the alleged incident, however, no specific role has been assigned to the applicant and she is in jail since 15.4.2026. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mukul Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rachana .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Upon considering the totality of facts, nature and the evidence reflected from record and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for bail. Hence, the present bail application is ALLOWED. 8. Let the applicant Rachana involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions :- (i) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of B.N.S.S. (iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that she shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in the trial court. (v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. 9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 10. It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. The trial court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything said in this order. May 7, 2026 Madhurima BAIL No. 15521 of 2026 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- MADHURIMA GARG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- MADHURIMA GARG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad