-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** 117 Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 1. RFA-237-2020 (O&M) Sadbhavna Charitable Trust …Appellant Versus State Of Haryana & Others …Respondents And Sr. No. Case No. Appellant(s) Respondent(s) 2. RFA-396-2020 Ranbir Singh & Another State Of Haryana & Others 3. RFA-877-2020 Kuldeep Kumar (Deceased) Through His LRs & Another State Of Haryana Through Lac (DRO) & Another 4. RFA-153-2020 Kulbhushan Narang & Another State Of Haryana & Others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Shoaib Khan, Advocate for appellant(s) (in RFA-237-2020, RFA-396-2020 & RFA-153-2020) Mr. Chanakya Batta, Advocate for appellant(s) (in RFA-877-2020) Mr. Abhinash Jain, Additional Advocate General, Haryana Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate with Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate and Ms. Parul Saini, Advocate For Mata Mansa Devi Shrine Board *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. As common issues are involved in the captioned appeals, with the consent of both sides, the same are hereby disposed of by this common SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.07.14 18:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2- order. For the sake of brevity and convenience, facts are borrowed from RFA-237-2020. 2. Learned State counsel submits that present appeals are squarely covered by judgment dated 27.05.2020 passed by this Court in bunch of appeals including RFA-3863-2019 read with order dated 29.05.2020. The land in question formed part of notification which was under consideration in aforesaid judgment. 3. Learned counsel for appellant(s) expressed his inability to controvert aforesaid factual and legal position. 4. In the wake of statement of both sides, instant appeals stand disposed of in terms of RFA-3863-2019. 5. Pending Misc. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 14.07.2026 SDK Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.07.14 18:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document