Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010274822019
2026:CGHC:32213
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6264 of 2019 1 - Khem Giri Goswami S/o Late Shambhu Giri Aged About 46 Years R/o Forest Colony, Pithora, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Forest Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Divisional Forest Officer, Division Mahasamund, District Mahsamund Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Duvisional Forest Officer Forest Division Pithora, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 4 - Forest Ranger Forest Rage, Pithora, District Mahsamund Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Mr. Shikhar Sharma, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. HAPS Bhatia, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 28.07.2026
1. Heard.
2. In this petition, the petitioner has challenged order dated 02.03.2019 (Annexure-P/01) passed by the Divisional Forest Officer, Mahasamund (respondent No.02), however, the petitioner has remedy to approach the Conservator of Forest of the concerned Division for SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN
2 redressal of his grievance.
3. In that view of the matter, this writ petition stands disposed of by reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the Conservator of Forest of the concerned Division alongwith all the documents and copy of this order for redressal of his grievance within a period of 02 weeks from today and, in turn, the said authority shall considered and decided petitioner’s said representation in accordance with law within 45 days from the date of receipt of said representation by passing reasoned and speaking order. Till, the said representation is decided, impugned order dated 02.03.2019 (Annexure-P/01) shall not be given effect to.
4. With aforesaid observation, direction and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands finally dispsoed of.
sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge s@if