CRWP No.8200 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 161 Harman Singh and another State of Punjab CORAM: Present: SUMEET GOEL 1. By way of present petition filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect their life and liberty at the hands of respondent Nos.4 to 2. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3. On the asking of the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. 4. As per the petitioners, they have married on wishes of respondent Nos. 4 to members/relative of the petitioners. 5. Both the petitioners have claimed themselves to be major relying upon their Aadhar Cards indicating that date of birth of petitioner No.1 Harman Singh 8200 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** Harman Singh and another v. Punjab and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Mr. Neeraj Jain, Advocate for the petitioners --- SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral) By way of present petition filed under Article 226 Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect their life and liberty at the hands of respondent Nos.4 to Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to On the asking of the Court, Mr. Hemant Aggarwal, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. As per the petitioners, they have married on wishes of respondent Nos. 4 to 6, who happen to be the family embers/relative of the petitioners. Both the petitioners have claimed themselves to be major relying upon their Aadhar Cards indicating that date of birth of petitioner No.1 Harman Singh is 16.11.2004 and petitioner No.2 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No.8200 of 2026 Date of decision: 15.7.2026 Date of uploading : 15.7.2026 …......Petitioners …......Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL , Advocate for the petitioners By way of present petition filed under Article 226 of the read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, petitioners are seeking issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect their life and liberty at the hands of respondent Nos.4 to 6. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Hemant Aggarwal, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. As per the petitioners, they have married on 6.7.2026 against the , who happen to be the family Both the petitioners have claimed themselves to be major relying upon their Aadhar Cards indicating that date of birth of petitioner No.1- and petitioner No.2-Kajal Rani is 1.1.2006. of 2026 2026 2026 of the , petitioners are seeking issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect their , against the , who happen to be the family Both the petitioners have claimed themselves to be major relying - ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.07.15 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No.8200 6. Without commenting on the legality and validity of the marriage as also the merits of contentions raised in the petition, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2 Sahib to look into the representation dat to have been submitted by the petitioners & pass appropriate orders thereupon within two weeks from today. 7. Keeping in view the fact that both the petitioners claim to have married against the wishes of their family(s) respondent No.2 call a meeting of the petitioners as well as the parents of both the petitioners and their other concerned family members in his/her presence so that the p amicably. 8. Liberty is reserved in favour of private respondents to seek recall of this order on showing sufficient cause. 9. However, if the petitioners are found to have been involved in any other case, then this order shall not preclude the competent authority from taking lawful action against the petitioners. 10. The petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 15.7.2026 Ashwanii 8200 of 2026 Without commenting on the legality and validity of the marriage as also the merits of contentions raised in the petition, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, to look into the representation dated to have been submitted by the petitioners & pass appropriate orders thereupon within two weeks from today. Keeping in view the fact that both the petitioners claim to have married against the wishes of their family(s) spondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, call a meeting of the petitioners as well as the parents of both the petitioners and their other concerned family members in his/her presence so that the parties may endeavour to resolve their dispute(s) and live amicably. Liberty is reserved in favour of private respondents to seek recall of this order on showing sufficient cause. However, if the petitioners are found to have been involved in any her case, then this order shall not preclude the competent authority from taking lawful action against the petitioners. The petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: -2- Without commenting on the legality and validity of the marriage as also the merits of contentions raised in the petition, I deem it appropriate Superintendent of Police, Sri Muktsar ed 8.7.2026 (Annexure P-5) stated to have been submitted by the petitioners & pass appropriate orders Keeping in view the fact that both the petitioners claim to have married against the wishes of their family(s), I direct that if possible, Superintendent of Police, Sri Muktsar Sahib may call a meeting of the petitioners as well as the parents of both the petitioners and their other concerned family members in his/her presence arties may endeavour to resolve their dispute(s) and live Liberty is reserved in favour of private respondents to seek recall of However, if the petitioners are found to have been involved in any her case, then this order shall not preclude the competent authority from taking lawful action against the petitioners. The petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Without commenting on the legality and validity of the marriage as also the merits of contentions raised in the petition, I deem it appropriate Sri Muktsar 5) stated to have been submitted by the petitioners & pass appropriate orders Keeping in view the fact that both the petitioners claim to have , I direct that if possible, may call a meeting of the petitioners as well as the parents of both the petitioners and their other concerned family members in his/her presence arties may endeavour to resolve their dispute(s) and live Liberty is reserved in favour of private respondents to seek recall of However, if the petitioners are found to have been involved in any her case, then this order shall not preclude the competent authority from The petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.07.15 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document