CRM-M-34834-2026 #1# IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. 105 CRM-M-34834-2026 Date of Decision:-15.07.2026 Jatin Kumar. ......Petitioner. Vs. State of Haryana. ......Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present:- Mr. Neeraj Sansaniwal, Advocate & Mr. Sumer Khod, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Aditi Girdhar, AAG Haryana. *** RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI, J. (ORAL) 1. Through the present petition, the petitioner prays for interim regular bail for a period of 02 months in case bearing FIR No.363 dated 26.09.2025 under Section 109(1), 132, 121(1), 221, 3(5) of BNS and Section 25(1-B)(a) of Arms Act registered at P.S. Rajendra Park, Gurugram. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has inter alia argued that the petitioner sustained gunshot injury on his leg/knee in the alleged encounter allegedly taking place on 26.09.2025 which gave birth to the above mentioned FIR; that consequent thereto, the petitioner was shifted to a hospital and was subjected to treatment/surgical intervention and metallic plates/rods were implanted in his knee joint coupled with multiple external VINAY MAHAJAN 2026.07.15 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-34834-2026 #2# fixators, screws and joints inserted in his leg for stabilization of the fracture; that since 26.09.2025, condition of the petitioner has not improved and the plates/rods inserted in his leg have till date not been removed; that because of the said fixators, the petitioner is suffering from severe continuous pain, infection at surgical site, persistent pus discharge, incomplete bone healing and his condition has deteriorated because of lack of proper medical care and specialized treatment; that the petitioner has been granted interim bail for a period of 02 weeks from the date of his release in case FIR No.212 of 2025 under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of BNS and Sections 25, 27 & 54 of Arms Act registered at Police Station Najafgarh, New Delhi; that because of his incarceration in the present FIR, the petitioner has till date not furnished bail and surety bonds for his release on interim bail in the said matter also; that the petitioner undertakes that he will not file any application for extension of interim bail granted to him by this Court today; that for availing appropriate medical facilities, the petitioner may be granted interim bail for a period of 02 weeks only from the date of his release; that while on interim bail, the petitioner undertakes not to indulge in any unlawful activity; and that to assure this court of the said undertaking, the petitioner is ready to furnish two heavy sureties. 3. Per contra, learned State Counsel has opposed for grant of interim bail to the petitioner. However, while referring to para 16 of the Status report dated 10.07.2026 filed by her today in the Court, she concedes that the petitioner has been shown in the said report to be on a wheel chair on account of a metallic external fixator applied to his right leg. She in fact has opposed the said interim bail on the ground that outcome of Pus Culture sensitivity test is awaited from DDU Hospital. VINAY MAHAJAN 2026.07.15 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-34834-2026 #3# 4. The said opposition shows that pus was detected in alleged injury of the petitioner and fixator has been applied to the same. The petitioner has already been granted interim bail for a period of 02 weeks from the date of his release in the murder FIR in which the petitioner was being tried to be apprehended when the occurrence in question took place. If the status report filed in the court today is perused in its substance, it conveys that the medical condition of the petitioner requires immediate attention. 5. Therefore, the petitioner on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (rupees two lacs only) with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court/CJM/Area Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, is ordered to be released on interim bail in the FIR/case in question for a period of 02 weeks from the date of his release with a condition that as undertaken by his counsel, the petitioner will not apply for extension of interim bail granted to him today in the matter in question. On expiry of the said 14 days, he will surrender before the concerned jail authorities. 6. Petition is disposed of accordingly. 7. All interim applications, if any, also stand disposed off. ( RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI ) JUDGE 15.07.2026 Vinay Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No VINAY MAHAJAN 2026.07.15 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document