- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35500 CRL.RP No. 670 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 670 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. HITESH CONSTRUCTIONS CO OFFICE AT NO.833, 16TH CROSS, 7TH MAIN, ISRO LAYOUT, BENGALURU – 560 111. REP BY ITS PARTNERS. 2. SRI.C.P.VIJAYA KUMAR, S/O C.Y.PANDURANGA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 3. SMT PRATHIMA VIJAYAKUMAR W/O.C.P.VIJAYAKUMAR , AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT NO.43/44/45, 1 ST MAIN, PRASHANTH NAGAR EXTN, VASANTHAPURA MAIN ROAD, ISRO LAYOUT, BENGALURU – 560 111. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HEMANTHA B ,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S POLICE OFFICERS AND STAFF HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPP SOCIETY Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35500 CRL.RP No. 670 of 2025 REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, SRI.G.L.SHIVAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT MAJOR, NO.23/3, HARE KRISHNA ROAD, NEAR FILM CHAMBER, SHIVANANDA CIRCLE, BANGALORE – 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SATHISHA D S, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 CR.PC (FILED U/S 438 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 06.04.2023 IN C.C.NO.126564/2019 PASSED BY THE HONBLE XXVI ACMM AT BENGALURU AND CONFIRMED BY THE HONBLE LXIX ADDL. C.C. AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU IN CRL.A.NO.594/2023 DATED 12.02.2025 AND ACQUIT THE ACCUSED/ PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that this Court has suspended the sentence vide order dated 28.04.2025 and till date, the same is not complied with. He further submits that the notice was issued to the accused but no reply was given and having taken note of the said submission, when the matter was came up before this Court for suspension of sentence, the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35500 CRL.RP No. 670 of 2025 sentence is suspended subject depositing of 50% of the amount and also executing a bond before the trial Court and the said conditional order was not complied till date. Hence, I do not find any grounds to entertain the revision petition and moreover the matter is not yet admitted. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35