Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2927 (ALL)

SONE LAL PATEL v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/15437/2026 · 2026-05-05

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15437 of 2026 Court No. - 65 (Sr. No.71 out of 259) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.58 of 2026, under Sections 64, 351(2) BNS, Police Station Sarai Inayat, District Prayagraj, during the pendency of trial. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the delay of about two and a half months in the institution of the FIR and that there is no recovery of any indecent video of the victim, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant- Sone Lal Patel, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arvind Kumar Srivastava, Vimal Kumar Bhaskar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sone Lal Patel .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. May 6, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 15437 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad