1 CGHC010241862026 2026:CGHC:32141 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 937 of 2026 Khemlal S/o Gayaram Aged About 40 Years Both Are Teli Cast R/o Village Gadhphuljhar, Tehsil Basna District Mahasamund C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Nandkishore S/o Pano -All Belonging To Teli Cast Cultivators, R/o Gadhphuljhar, Tehsil Basna District Mahasamund C.G. 2 - Satyanarayan S/o Pano -Teli Cast Cultivators, R/o Gadhphuljhar, Tehsil Basna District Mahasamund C.G. 3 - Ravishankar S/o Pano- Teli Cast Cultivators, R/o Gadhphuljhar, Tehsil Basna District Mahasamund C.G. 4 - Meena D/o Pano- Teli Cast Cultivators, R/o Gadhphuljhar, Tehsil Basna District Mahasamund C.G. 5 - Santoshi D/o Pano -Teli Cast Cultivators, R/o Gadhphuljhar, Tehsil Basna District Mahasamund C.G. 6 - Vimla D/o Pano -Teli Cast Cultivators, R/o Gadhphuljhar, Tehsil Basna District Mahasamund C.G. 7 - Hemlal S/o Bashtam- Teli Cast Cultivators, R/o Gadhphuljhar, Tehsil Basna District Mahasamund C.G. 8 - Agar Chand S/o Bashtam -Teli Cast Cultivators, R/o Gadhphuljhar, Tehsil Basna District Mahasamund C.G. 9 - Hukum Chand S/o Bashtam -Teli Cast Cultivators, R/o Gadhphuljhar, Tehsil Basna District Mahasamund C.G. 10 - Saroj D/o Bashtam, W/o Anadi -Teli Cast Cultivators, R/o Gadhphuljhar, Tehsil Basna District Mahasamund C.G. SUMIT KUMAR Digitally signed by SUMIT KUMAR 2 11 - Chandrama D/o Bashtam -Teli Cast Cultivators, R/o Gadhphuljhar, Tehsil Basna District Mahasamund C.G. 12 - Chandobai Wd/o Bashtam -Teli Cast Cultivators, R/o Gadhphuljhar, Tehsil Basna District Mahasamund C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Kesharwani, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Order on Board 27/07/2026 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Tehsildar has finally decided the application for partition on 06.07.2026 and the issue involved in the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous, therefore, he does not want to press the present writ petition, however, he would submit that the liberty may be reserved in favour of the petitioner to take all the defences available to him in the appeal against the order passed by the Tehsildar. 2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE Sumit