IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (211) CRM-M-29668-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-10.07.2026 ROHIT KUMAR … Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Shashikant Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG Haryana. Mr. Rohit Rana, Advocate and Mr. Jagjot Singh, Advocate for the complainant. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral) 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he intends to withdraw the instant petition at this stage. 2. In view of this, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage. 3. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 10th July, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.07.14 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document