Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2926 (UTT)

HARI DATT TIWARI v. DEEPAK RAWAT

CLCON/31/2026 · 2026-03-20

Alok Kumar Verma

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:1953 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 20TH MARCH, 2026 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.31 OF 2026 Hari Datt Tiwari ..…Petitioner Versus Deepak Rawat ..…Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, Advocate. Counsel for the State : Mr. Jagdish Singh Bisht, Standing Counsel. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J. Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Jagdish Singh Bisht, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. Mr. Deepak Rawat, Commissioner, Kumaon Mandal, Nainital is present through video conferencing. 4. Compliance affidavit is taken on record. 5. Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, Advocate, submitted on instructions that since the order dated 27.11.2025, passed in WPMS No.3298 of 2025, “Hari Datt Tiwari vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others”, has been complied with, therefore, the petitioner does not want to pursue further in the present contempt petition. 6. In view of the above, this contempt petition does not require any further consideration. Therefore, the proceedings in the present contempt petition are closed. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Date: 20.03.2026 Shiv/ 1