Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010279692026
2026:CGHC:32184-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1947 of 2026 Gangadas Manikpuri S/o Vishramdas Manikpuri Aged About 49 Years Occupation Society Manager, Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, R/o Village Budhwara, Police Station Sahaspur Lohara, District- Kabirdham Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Superintendent Of Police Kawardha District- Kabirdham (C.G.) 3 - Station House Officer Police Station Sahaspur Lohara, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) 4 - Branch Manager, Namely Santosh Kumar Gandharva S/o Late Shri Bishesar Gandharva Aged About 57 Years Working As Branch Manager, Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Branch Sahaspur Lohara, District- Kabirdham (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) (cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandrikaditya Pandey, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Anusha Naik, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per
Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
28/07/2026
1. Heard Mr. Chandrikaditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. Anusha Naik, learned Dy. Govt. Advocate, appearing for the SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2026.07.28 17:51:22 +0530
2 Respondent/State.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:
"(a) Allow this petition and quash the First Information Reports bearing FIR No. 79/2026, FIR No. 80/2026, and FIR No. 81/2026, Police Station Sahaspur Lohara, District Kabirdham (C.G.), along with all consequential proceedings and investigations arising therefrom, against the Petitioner/Applicant. (b) Stay all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned FIRs, including the investigation, pending the final disposal of this petition. (c) Issue any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
3. At the time of hearing, this Court has observed that the petitioner has filed the present petition seeking quashment of multiple First Information Reports, namely, FIR No. 79/2026, FIR No. 80/2026 and FIR No. 81/2026.
4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha)
Judge Chief Justice Sagrika