Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29245 (KAR)

DR RAJENDRA v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

WP/16746/2026 · 2026-07-10

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35251 WP No. 16746 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 16746 OF 2026 (S-R) BETWEEN: 1. DR RAJENDRA S/O. LATE SUBRAMANI NAIDU AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS OCC RETIRED MEDICAL OFFICER NO.433, OPP TO BET CONVENT, BEML 3RD STAGE, RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR BENGALURU - 560 098. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVSHANKER., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPT. OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE NO. 105, FIRST FLOOR VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER DEPT. OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE Digitally signed by SHILPABAI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35251 WP No. 16746 of 2026 AAROGYA SOUDHA, BINNIPET BANGALORE - 560 023. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAMESH G NAIK, AGA FOR RESPONDENTS) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE DIRECTIONS TO THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 17.03.2025 AND DATED 20-02-2026 MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A, B, C AND D RESPECTIVELY REGARDING ISSUANCE OF RETIREMENT ORDER AND PROPOSAL TO GRANT PENSION AND RETIREMENT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER The petitioner filed this writ petition seeking for mandamus directing respondents to consider the representation dated 17.03.2025, 17.03.2025, 20.02.2026 and 29.03 2005 vide Annexures A, B, C and D respectively, wherein the petitioner requested for issuance of retirement order and proposal to grant of promotion and retirement benefits. The respondents have not considered the representations. Hence, this writ petition. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35251 WP No. 16746 of 2026 2. Learned Government Advocate submits that if reasonable time is granted, the respondents will consider the representations vide Annexures - A to D and pass an appropriate order in accordance with the law. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate, the writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.3 to consider Annexures - A to D and pass an appropriate order in accordance with the law within a period of one month from the date of the receipt of the copy of this order. 4. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed off accordingly. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SSB