Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29243 (PNJ)

MANPHOOL SINGH v. 1STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, POWER DEPARTMENT, PUNJAB CIV

CWP/20689/2026 · 2026-07-10

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 116 MANPHOOL SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: Present: TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA directing the third respondent to decide the petitioner’ P-10, for shifting of his tubewell connection. 2. advance notice, expeditiously in accordance with law. 3. has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 4. July 10, 2026 Jaspreet Kaur IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP- Date of decision: July 10, 2026 MANPHOOL SINGH Versus PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Lalit Singla, Advocate and Ms. Varsha Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Arora, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Prit Inder Paul Singh, Advocate with Mr. Amitoj Bir Singh, Advocate for respondents no.2 and 3/PSPCL. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia directing the third respondent to decide the petitioner’ 10, for shifting of his tubewell connection. Learned counsel for respondents advance notice, submits that petitioner’s pending application will be decided expeditiously in accordance with law. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. July 10, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -20689-2026 Date of decision: July 10, 2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondents TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Vikas Arora, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Prit Inder Paul Singh, Advocate with or respondents no.2 and 3/PSPCL. inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the third respondent to decide the petitioner’s application, Annexure no.2 and 3/PSPCL, appearing on submits that petitioner’s pending application will be decided In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE  : Yes/No : Yes/No ...Petitioner ...Respondents mandamus s application, Annexure , appearing on submits that petitioner’s pending application will be decided In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner JASPREET KAUR 2026.07.14 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh