- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010096732024 NC: 2026:KHC:36017 WP NO.4872 OF 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.4872 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. G.N. THOLASIRAMAIAH S/O LATE G. NANJA REDDY G/S/O LATE PUNGANUR THIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS. 2. SRI. G.N. SATYANARAYANA S/O LATE G. NANJA REDDY, G/S/O LATE PUNGANUR THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. 3. SRI. G.N. JAGANNATH REDDY S/O LATE G. NANJA REDDY, G/S/O LATE PUNGANUR THIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS. 4. SRI. G.N. KODANDAPPA S/O LATE G. NANJA REDDY, G/S/O LATE PUNGANUR THIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 5. SRI. RAMA REDDY S/O LATE G. NANJA REDDY, G/S/O LATE PUNGANUR THIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. 6. SMT. SUNANDAMMA D/O . LATE G NANJA REDDY, G/D/O LATE PUNGANUR THIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF GUNJUR VILLAGE, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010096732024 NC: 2026:KHC:36017 WP NO.4872 OF 2024 VARTHUR HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST DISTRICT - 560 087. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. IMRAN PASHA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. THE SPECIAL TAHASILDAR BENGALURU EAST TALUK, K.R. PURAM, BENGALURU - 560 036. 4. SRI. MUNIVENAKATAPPA S/O LATE SANJEEVA REDDY AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS. 5. SRI. G.S. HANUMANTHA REDDY S/O LATE SANJEEVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. RESPONDENTS 4 AND 5 ARE R/O GUNJUR VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST DISTRICT. NARAYAN REDDY SINCE DEAD, BY LRS. 6. SMT. KRISHNAMMA W/O LATE NARAYAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 7. SMT. MANOHARAMMA W/O LATE ANNIAH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010096732024 NC: 2026:KHC:36017 WP NO.4872 OF 2024 RESPONDENTS 6 AND 7 ARE R/O VANAKANALLI VILLAGE, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT. 8. SRI. VENUGOPAL REDDY S/O LATE ANJANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 9. SRI. SRINIVASA REDDY S/O LATE PAPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 10. PAPAREDDY SINCE DEAD, BY LR. ALREADY ON RECORD AS RESPONDENT NO.9-SRINIVASA REDDY. 11. SRI. MAHENDRA REDDY S/O LATE ANJANA REDDY, AGE: MAJOR. 12. SRI. CHANDRA SHEKAR S/O LATE ANJANA REDDY, AGE: MAJOR. 13. SRI. VENKATESH REDDY S/O LATE ANJANA REDDY, AGE: MAJOR. RESPONDENTS 8 TO 12 ARE R/OF GUNJUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. K.M. JAGANATH, ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R7; SRI. C.M. GOVINDAREDDY, ADVOCATE R11; R8, R9, R12 AND R13 - SERVED; R10-DECEASED) - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010096732024 NC: 2026:KHC:36017 WP NO.4872 OF 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE ORDER ATED 07TH FEBRUARY, 2020 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1-DEPUTY COMMISSIONER IN REVISION PETTIION NO.359/2010-11 VIDE ANNEXURE-J; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioners are challenging the order dated 07th February, 2020 (Annexure-J) passed by the respondent No.1-Deputy Commissioner in Revision Petition No.359/2010-11. 2. Heard Sri. Imran Pasha, learned counsel appearing for petitioners; Sri. Spoorthy Hegde N., learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 3; Sri. K.M. Jaganath, learned counsel appearing for respondents 4 to 7; and Sri. C.M. Govindareddy, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.11. 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful perusal of finding recorded in the impugned order, it is forthcoming that the respondent No.1- Deputy Commissioner, after considering the material on record - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010096732024 NC: 2026:KHC:36017 WP NO.4872 OF 2024 particularly, the judgment and decree passed in Original Suit No.958/2008 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru, had interfered with the order passed by the respondent No.2-Assistant Commissioner in Case No.R.A.656/2006-07 dated 15th January, 2010 (Annexure-H). Though the learned counsel appearing for petitioners submits that the petitioners herein were not parties in the Original Suit No.958/2008, I am of the view that, it is open for them to establish their right over the subject land in a manner known to law. Accordingly, reserving such liberty to the petitioners, writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6