Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29238 (MAD)

S.Perumal v. The State of TamilNadu

CRL OP(MD)/10134/2026 · 2026-06-04

R Vijayakumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10134 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.06.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.O.P(MD)No.10134 of 2026 S.Perumal ... Petitioner Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by 1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli City, Tirunelveli. 3. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli. 4. The Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Tirunelveli City. 5. M.R.Palraj, Chairman, Kalaiarasi Educational Trust, Tamirabarani Engineering College, Chatrampudukulam, Thachanallur, Tirunelveli. ... Respondents 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10134 of 2026 Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, praying this Court to direct the fourth respondent not to harass the petitioner and not to interfere in civil dispute and pass such further or other order as this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Selvan For Respondents : Mr.B.Arun Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) ORDER The present petition has been filed seeking a prayer not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry. 2. According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, complaint earlier lodged by the fifth respondent was closed by the third respondent. Therefore, the second complaint ought not to have been entertained by the fourth respondent. 3. The learned Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) submitted that based upon the Court order, the sale agreement was referred for forensic expert opinion and it has been found out that the document is a forged one. Therefore, in such circumstances, the second complaint lodged by the fifth respondent was entertained by the fourth respondent. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10134 of 2026 4. In such view of the matter, the fourth respondent is directed to complete the enquiry within a period of two weeks. 5. With the above said observation, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 04.06.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli City, Tirunelveli. 3. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli. 4. The Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Tirunelveli City. 5. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10134 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. ebsi Crl.O.P(MD)No.10134 of 2026 04.06.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis