- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010469432026 NC: 2026:KHC:36079 WP No. 21251 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 21251 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. B.V. LEELAVATHI D/O.B.K. VEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT.D.N.NAGARAJ, SHIVAPRASAD 5TH MAIN, ASHOKA NAGARA, TUMKUR-572103. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKAT SATYANARAYANA A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577501 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CHITRADURGA, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577501. 3. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, PARASHURAMPURA HOBLI, CHALLAKERE TALUK-577538. 4. SRI.B.K.KENCHARAYAPPA S/O.B.K.KENCHAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS HOSAMANE, DODDABEERANAHALLY VILLAGE, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010469432026 NC: 2026:KHC:36079 WP No. 21251 of 2026 PARASHURAMPURA HOBLI, CHALLAKERE TALUK-577538. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.B.P.RADHA., AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 25.02.2026 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 (PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-F) CASE R.P./24/25 AND THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 11.06.2024 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 (PRODUCED ANNEXURE- E) BEARING NO. NAM.R.A.445/2021-22 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents No.1 to 3. 2. In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 25.02.2026 (Annexure-F), passed by the respondent No.1 - Deputy Commissioner and order dated 11.06.2024 (Annexure-E) passed by the respondent No.2- Assistant Commissioner. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010469432026 NC: 2026:KHC:36079 WP No. 21251 of 2026 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of the impugned order passed by the respondent - authorities, would indicate that the petitioner is challenging the M.R.No.27/1994-95 after 29 years and respondent No.4 claims to be the son of K.Kenchappa, who is brother of petitioner's father. 4. In that view of the matter, as the petitioner has slept over 29 years, without there being challenging the MR No.27/1994-95, I am of the view that, it is open for the petitioner to establish her right over the property in question before the competent civil court in a manner known to Law. With these observations, the petition is accordingly, rejected. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE KLY; List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39