ROHIT BHADANA S/O LATE SHRI DHARAMBIR BHADANA, v. INDIRA SINGHAL W/O SHRI BANWARI LAL SINGHAL
ARBAP/82/2024 · 2026-04-24
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2923 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2923 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:17555] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Misc. Arbitration Application No. 82/2024 Rohit Bhadana S/o Late Shri Dharambir Bhadana, Deceased Partner Of M/s Balaji Minerals, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 169, Sector 15-A, Faridabad, Haryana. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Indira Singhal W/o Shri Banwari Lal Singhal, Aged About 71 Years, R/o Sukh Bhawan, Civil Lines, Alwar, Rajasthan, Surviving Partner Of M/s Balaji Minerals, Sukh Bhawan, Civil Lines, Alwar, Rajasthan.
2. M/s Balaji Minerals, Through Its Sole Surviving Partner, Smt. Indira Singhal, Sukh Bhawan, Civil Lines, Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. David Mehla HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order 24/04/2026
1. Heard.
2. The dispute has arisen between the parties and the petitioner seek appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the same. The partnership deed was executed between the father of the petitioner and the respondents. Father of the petitioner expired on 29.04.2021. Earlier the petitioner filed a civil suit, which was dismissed on 20.04.2022 on the basis that there is an arbitration clause and the civil suit would not lie. Thereafter, the application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the ‘the Act of 1996’) was filed, wherein order has
[2026:RJ-JP:17555] (2 of 2) [ARBAP-82/2024] been passed on 05.08.2025, whereby the application under Section 9 of the Act has been dismissed. Thus, it is clear that the petitioner wants to raise certain disputes before the Arbitrator with regard to the rendition of the accounts of the firm.
3. This Court, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, appoints Mr. Ayub Khan (Retd. District Judge), R/o-130, Sanjay Nagar-B, Jhotwara, Jaipur-302012 to act as Sole Arbitrator and to decide all issues without prejudice to the rights and
contentions raised in the present application. The arbitration fees shall be determined in accordance with the Fourth Schedule of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 1996’), as amended. The fee of the Arbitrator will be equally borne by both the parties. The place of arbitration shall be at Jaipur.
4. The Arbitrator is requested to complete the proceedings as per time limit specified under Section 29A of the Act of 1996.
5. The arbitration application is allowed accordingly.
6. Copy of this order be sent to the appointed Sole Arbitrator.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ SANJAY KUMAWAT/RAJAT/37