Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29208 (KAR)

SMT KOTTA KOTA RAVANAMMA v. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

WP/9552/2026 · 2026-07-16

M Nagaprasanna, Venkatesh Naik T

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010218942026 NC: 2026:KHC:36600-DB WP No. 9552 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T WRIT PETITION NO.9552 OF 2026 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN: SMT. KOTTA KOTA RAVANAMMA W/O. SRI K. OBULESU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.3, 12TH MAIN SIDDASHREE LAYOUT ANANTHAPURA, RAMAGONDANAHALLI YELAHANKA, SINGANAYAKANAHALLI BENGALURU - 560 064. …PETITIONER (BY SRI ANUSHA NANDISH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PRECINCTS 5TH MAIN ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST GUTTAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 020 REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER. 2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER (DR. SHIVARAM KARANTH LAYOUT RAMAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE) BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PRECINCTS 5TH MAIN ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST GUTTAHALLI BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHIVAPRASAD M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by RAKSHA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010218942026 NC: 2026:KHC:36600-DB WP No. 9552 of 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS, ANY ORDER(S)/DIRECTIONS DIRECTING RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2 TO CONSIDER THE NON-CONSIDERATION OF HER REPRESENTATION DATED NIL BEARING ACKNOWLEDGMENT NO.348512 DATED 1-2-2019 BY RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2 FOR THE PURPOSE OF REGULARISATION OF HER RESIDENTIAL HOUSE INTO DR. SHIVARAMKARANTH LAYOUT, BEARING SITE NO.3 IN KATHA NO.540/3 IN RAMAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, MEASURING EAST-WEST: 25FT, NORTH- SOUTH: 44 FT, TOTALLY MEASURING 1100 SQ. FT. (ANNEXURE-A) AND TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF REGULARISATION WITHIN A PERIOD OF TWO WEEKS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T) The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following prayer: "a. Issue a Writ of Mandamus, any Order(s)/Directions directing the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the non-consideration of her representation dated Nil bearing acknowledgment No.348512 dated 01.02.2019 by Respondent Nos.1 and 2 for the purpose of regularisation of her residential house into the Dr. Shivaramkaranth Layout bearing Site No.3 in Katha No.540/3 in Ramagondanahalli Village, Yelahanka, Bengaluru - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010218942026 NC: 2026:KHC:36600-DB WP No. 9552 of 2026 North Taluk, measuring East-West: 25 Ft., North- South: 44 Ft, totally measuring 1100 Sq. Ft. (Annexure-A) and to issue a Certificate of Regularisation within a period of 2 weeks." 2. Heard Smt. Anusha Nandish, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Shivaprasad M. Shantanagoudar, learned standing counsel for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner is the absolute owner of residential house in Site No.3, Katha No.540/3 of Ramagondanahalli Village, Yelahanka, Bengaluru North Taluk, measuring East-West: 25 feet, North-South 44 feet, totally measuring 1100 square feet, having purchased the same under a registered Sale Deed dated 26.09.2012. The petitioner has constructed a residential building in the schedule property in the year 2013 itself, she is the Kathedar of the schedule property and regularly paying the tax. In the meanwhile, the respondents-Bengaluru - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010218942026 NC: 2026:KHC:36600-DB WP No. 9552 of 2026 Development Authority has issued preliminary notification dated 30.12.2008 for acquisition of Dr. Shivaram Karanth Layout. Hence, the petitioner submitted her representation on 01.02.2019 for regularisation of her residential house, but the Bengaluru Development Authority did not consider her request. The representation not having met its consideration, the petitioner has preferred this petition before this Court. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.5647 of 2025 (LA-BDA), disposed on 07.03.2025, which was identical to the case at hand, had passed the following order: “2. The learned counsel appearing for the Bengaluru Development Authority (for short, BDA) would submit that the representation was submitted to the Committee, which is no longer in subsistence. 3. In that light, we deem it appropriate to dispose the petition, reserving liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the BDA identical to what was placed before the Committee on 25th August, 2021. - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010218942026 NC: 2026:KHC:36600-DB WP No. 9552 of 2026 In the event, the representation is submitted in the next two weeks, the BDA shall consider the same and pass necessary orders on the representation and communicate the decision taken within eight weeks, thereafter. Till such time, status-quo qua the property be maintained by the parties.” Therefore, the learned counsel seeks that an identical direction be issued to Bengaluru Development Authority to consider the representation of the petitioner. 5. In the light of the afore-quoted order, we deem it appropriate to pass the following O R D E R i. Writ petition is disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the respondents-Bengaluru Development Authority, identical to what was placed before the respondents-Bengaluru Development Authority. ii. In the event, the petitioner submits a fresh representation, the respondents-Bengaluru Development Authority to consider the - 6 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010218942026 NC: 2026:KHC:36600-DB WP No. 9552 of 2026 representation, within an outer limit of twelve weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. iii. The respondents-Bengaluru Development Authority shall also communicate the order that would be passed on the representation to the petitioner. iv. Till the consideration of the representation happens, the parties are directed to maintain status-quo qua the property of the petitioner. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE KVK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29