Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29202 (CAL)

MOJAHID SK @ MUJAID ALI @ MOHAMMAD MUJAHID ALI @ MOHAMMA MUJAHID ALI v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/896/2026 · 2026-07-22

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L667 22.07.2026 Bpg. C.R.M. (A) 896 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Mojahid Sk @ Mujaid Ali @ Mohammad Mujahid Ali @ Mohamma Mujahid Ali Versus State of West Bengal Mr. Navanil De Mr. Subhrajit Dey. …for the petitioner. Mr. Pritam Roy. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already approached the regular court and, as such, the prayer for anticipatory bail has become infructuous. Petitioner intends, as such, not to proceed with the present application. Learned advocate for the State is present. In view of the submissions advanced, CRM(A)896 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 2