Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29190 (KAR)

R P KUMARSWAMY, v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/18667/2025 · 2026-07-14

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35936 WP No. 18667 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 18667 OF 2025 (GM-R/C) BETWEEN: R P KUMARSWAMY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS S/O LATE PUTTAIAH SRI LAKSHMI NARASIMHA SWAMY TEMPLE BETTADA MALE, RAJATHADRIPURA HATYAALU BETTA, TIPATURU TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572114. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PARIKSHIT S. S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARMENT OF HINDU RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS VIDHANASOUDTHA BENGALURUR-560011. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMAKURU DISTRICT TUMAKURU-572101. 3. ASST. COMMISSIONER TIPATURU SUB DIVISION TIPATURU-572201. 4. SRI. MAHALINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS S/O NARASAPPA 'LJLWDOO\VLJQHG E\6+:(7+$ 5$*+$9(1'5$ /RFDWLRQ+,*+ &28572) .$51$7$.$ - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35936 WP No. 18667 of 2025 R/OF RAJATHADRIPURA VILLAGE & POST KIBBANAHALLI HOBLI TIPATURUR TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572114. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. C H DEVARAJ, GA, FOR R1 TO R3: SRI. CHRISTOPHER NOEL A, ADVOCATE FOR C/R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT ORDER QUASHING THE MODIFIED ORDER ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 29/05/2025 BEARING NO. DVS(1)CR 20/23-24 VIDE ANNEXURE-J, ONLY WITH RESPECT TO RETAINING ADDITIONAL POOJA ROTATION ALLOTTED TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER 2025 AND ALLOTTING 15 DAYS POOJA TO THE PETITIONER IN THE MONTH OF OCTOBER FROM 01/10/2025 TO 15/10/2025 AND NOVEMBER FROM 01/11/2015 TO 15/11/2015 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the above petition has been rendered infructuous. Hence, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE KTY/LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 0