IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30181 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-288 Year-2025 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria ====================================================== Pratap Sharma son of Shahdev Sharma Resident of Village -Ram Nagar Math, (Gopi Tola), P.S.- Gangaur, Distt. -Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP For the Informant : Ms. Seema Kumari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 5 13-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Khagaria P.S. Case No. 288 of 2025, G.R. No. 2784 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 80, 238, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is the husband of the deceased who is alleged to have killed the deceased. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He is in custody since 04.12.2025. 5. Learned counsel for the Informant and learned APP for the State have vehemently opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner. 6. From the collected materials available on Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30181 of 2026(5) dt.13-08-2026 2/2 record during investigation, it appears that the deceased had a fight with her husband following which her husband left the house. Thereafter, the deceased closed all the doors and windows of the house and committed suicide. Later the door was opened and it was discovered that the deceased had committed suicide. 7. In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this application is allowed. 8. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Khagaria/ concerned Court in connection with Khagaria P.S. Case No. 288 of 2025. 9. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. shalini/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T