1 CGHC010147252026 2026:CGHC:31828-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA(MAT) No. 175 of 2026 1 - Rajesh Kumar Sahu S/o- Haridas Sahu Aged About 50 Years Resident Of Shradha Nivas, Sindhiya Nagar, East Durg, Post S.A.F. Line, Tehsil And District- Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - Smt. Seema @ Tejasvani Sahu Daughter Of D.R. Sahu, Aged About 48 Years Resident Of Model Town, Near Atta Chakki, P.O. Motilal Nehru Nagar, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. (Wife) 2 - Raja @ Aditya, Aged About 21 Years Resident Of C/o- D.R. Sahu, Model Town, Near Atta Chakki, P.O. Motilal Nehru Nagar, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Rudranath Mukherjee, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. U.K.S. Chandel, Advocate D.B. Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Hon’ble Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, Judge JUDGMENT ON BOARD Per Parth Prateem Sahu J. 21/07/2026 1. Heard on I.A. No. 01/2026 which is an application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal. 2 2. On due consideration of the submissions made by the counsel for the appellant as also, the reasons assigned in the application, I.A. No. 01/2026 is allowed. Delay in filing of the appeal is condoned. 3. With the consent of parties, case is heard finally at the motion stage. 4. The appellant has filed this appeal under Section 19 (1) of the Family Court Act, 1984 challenging the impugned judgment and decree dated 31.01.2023 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Janjgir, District – Janjgir - Champa in Civil Suit Case No. 326A/2022 (Rajesh Kumar Sahu Vs. Smt. Seema @ Tejasvani Sahu) whereby, the application filed under Section 13 (B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by the parties was allowed and learned Family Court dissolved the marriage by decree of divorce. 5. The provision under sub-section 2 of Section 19 provides that ‘no appeal shall lie from a decree or order passed by the Family Court with the consent of parties’. In the aforementioned facts of the case, when the impugned judgment and decree is passed with the consent of parties under Section 13 (B) of the Act, 1955, the appeal filed is not maintainable. 6. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY